Is carbon offsetting the same as net zero?

In recent years, the terms “carbon offsetting” and “net zero” have become increasingly popular as individuals, companies, and governments seek to reduce their carbon footprint and mitigate the effects of climate change. While these two terms are often used interchangeably, they actually refer to different concepts. In this article, we will explore the differences between carbon offsetting and net zero and examine whether they are truly equivalent.

Carbon offsetting is a process by which individuals or organisations purchase carbon credits to compensate for their carbon emissions. Carbon credits represent a reduction of one tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) from an emissions reduction project that would not have happened without the support of the buyer. The idea behind carbon offsetting is that by investing in emissions reduction projects such as renewable energy, energy efficiency, or reforestation, individuals or organisations can offset their own carbon emissions and contribute to the fight against climate change.

Net zero, on the other hand, refers to achieving a balance between the amount of greenhouse gas emissions produced and the amount removed from the atmosphere. This can be achieved through a combination of reducing emissions and removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere through natural or artificial means, such as afforestation, reforestation, or carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology. The goal of net zero is to reach a point where the amount of greenhouse gases emitted is no greater than the amount removed, effectively halting the increase in atmospheric concentrations of these gases.

So, are carbon offsetting and net zero the same thing? The short answer is no. While carbon offsetting can be a part of a net zero strategy, it does not necessarily achieve net zero in and of itself. This is because carbon offsetting only addresses the emissions that have already been produced, whereas net zero requires not only offsetting but also reducing future emissions and actively removing carbon from the atmosphere.

In fact, carbon offsetting has come under criticism in recent years for not doing enough to address the root causes of climate change. Some critics argue that purchasing carbon credits can give individuals and organisations a false sense of security, allowing them to continue emitting greenhouse gases without making meaningful efforts to reduce their carbon footprint. Additionally, there are concerns that carbon offsetting projects can be of dubious quality or may not deliver the promised emissions reductions.

However, carbon offsetting can still be a useful tool for individuals and organisations looking to reduce their carbon footprint while working towards net zero. By purchasing carbon credits from reputable providers and investing in high-quality emissions reduction projects, individuals and organisations can help support the transition to a low-carbon economy and contribute to global efforts to address climate change.

In addition to carbon offsetting, there are a number of other strategies that can be used to achieve net zero. One key approach is to reduce emissions through energy efficiency, renewable energy, and other low-carbon technologies. This can involve anything from upgrading buildings to be more energy-efficient to transitioning to electric vehicles or using carbon-free fuels.

Another important strategy is to actively remove carbon from the atmosphere. This can be done through afforestation and reforestation, which involves planting new trees or restoring forests that have been degraded or destroyed. Forests are important carbon sinks, meaning that they absorb and store carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Additionally, innovative new technologies such as CCS and direct air capture (DAC) are being developed to capture carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and store it permanently underground or use it for industrial processes.

In conclusion, while carbon offsetting and net zero are related concepts, they are not the same thing. Carbon offsetting can be a useful tool for individuals and organisations looking to reduce their carbon footprint and contribute to the fight against climate change, but it should not be seen as a substitute for more comprehensive efforts to achieve net zero. Ultimately, achieving net zero will require a combination of emissions reduction, and offsetting for many years to come.

author avatar
Humperdinck Jackman
Leads the daily operations at ESG PRO, he specialises in matters of corporate governance. Humperdinck hails from Bermuda, has twice sailed the Atlantic solo, and recently devoted a few years to fighting poachers in Kenya. Writing about business matters, he’s a published author, and his articles have been published in The Times, The Telegraph and various business journals.

Close

Matt Whiteman

I hope you enjoy reading this article.

Wherever you are on your ESG reporting journey you should talk to us!.

Get in Touch

Close

Swipe-up for help!